Oh, that's right, nowhere.
In preparation for the second episode of the season tonight, here are a few quick thoughts of mine on last week's season premiere of Lost, the show I love to watch just so I know enough to ruin it for everyone else. (I also admit to occasionally enjoying myself while watching it. But it's becoming increasingly more frustrating than anything else, and so now I'm fully committing myself to taking the fun out of it for everyone else. I just can't take another Damon Lindelof interview where he prepares the audience to be disappointed. The guy's got more excuses than Abu Ghraib. Really, I wanted to like the show at the beginning. But starting with the betrayal of what they presented as the concept before the first episode (really, where were the hints at the mystical hokum? the polar bears? any of it? I was looking forward to a good character drama in a confined space with a limited cast), they've consistently disappointed me with cliche after cliche after cheap storytelling device after dumb plot twist. Well, that's it.) Okay, onward.
The first problem is the writers don't seem to have grasped that it's no fun if everything is connected. When everyone is in everyone else's backstory and it's all intertwined and inevitable, then the connections lose all of their power. No individual connection or revelation has any meaning or appeal when everything is that way. It also makes the viewing experience tedious and unrewarding, when the question is no longer what is connected and what isn't, and why, but merely how they're going to connect this with that, because they have to.
Example: The Numbers, of course. They're everywhere. On jerseys in airports. On hatches. And now on some guy's medicine in the hatch. Now think about it. What possible satisfying explanation could there be for these numbers and their appearance all over the map? There is no way to tie all those things together without a pat "they're mystical numbers with a power beyond our comprehension" explanation. (And I'll be the first to admit it if they manage to tie it all together with something other than a disappointing explanation of that nature. Really, I'll be shocked, and I'll perform my justly dealt penance.) Either that, or we just won't get an explanation for most of their occurences. We'll learn some sort of origin and explanation for The Numbers, but most of their appearances will just be chalked up to their simple power and importance. Which, as should be pretty obvious, makes those occurences meaningless except as an easter egg hunt designed to distract from the complete absence of anything resembling a coherent story.
As for what we learned in this episode, I have to give them credit. They covered far more ground than I anticipated. But then there were those sure-to-be-meaningless connections again: Jack's future wife's car accident killed an older man who shared his last name with Shannon, whose father is dead. Coincidence? Probably not. But along with every other connection, at this point explicable only at the hands of some ultimate mystical power that has no relation to the real world or any viewer. Gee, can't wait.
But what I really can't wait to discover is: What's the story with Desmond? I can't imagine what they have planned for Desmond. They're too subtle, too insidious. I want to know what's in store for Desmond. Don't you?










Recent Comments